This poem seems to be usually
attributed to Emily Bronte rather than Charlotte, but may be a collaboration or
revision. There are clear similarities
with The Visionary and with I Now Had Only to Retrace. A brief overview of the arguments for and
against can be found here,
along with an analysis of the poem - which is perhaps a little more
enthusiastic than it warrants.
Here is a summary of what is
happening in each stanza. It is clearly
autobiographical, in that it deals with the supremacy of nature and the power
of her relationship to it, which suggests the Emily of “Wuthering Heights”. The
meaning is somewhat ambiguous: in common with other poems by both Charlotte and
Emily, there is a syntactical and lexical compactness, or shorthand, which tends
to make the train of the argument torturous at times. Often, interpretation relies on a single
punctuation mark and as many of these poems have been reconstructed from scraps
of manuscript, there is no hard and fast guarantee that any one interpretation
is correct. Learn to live with
ambiguity.
Often rebuked, yet always back returning
To those first feelings that were born with me,
And leaving busy chase of wealth and learning
For idle dreams of things which cannot be:
To those first feelings that were born with me,
And leaving busy chase of wealth and learning
For idle dreams of things which cannot be:
The opening lines are a rejection of
those that have advised her to “keep it real” – focus on the real world of work
and education instead of the imaginary world (“idle dreams” as her detractors describe them) that she indulged in
as a child – writing her stories, with her siblings, about Gondal and Angria. She comes back to them as being true to her
nature, her “first feelings”.
However, the stanza ends with a
colon, which suggests that a new idea is going to be introduced. Although she usually ignores her detractors,
and is happy to return to the world of the imagination, “Today” she is going to reject that world (the “shadowy region”) as well.
To-day, I will seek not the shadowy region;
Its unsustaining vastness waxes drear;
And visions rising, legion after legion,
Bring the unreal world too strangely near.
Its unsustaining vastness waxes drear;
And visions rising, legion after legion,
Bring the unreal world too strangely near.
The illusory life that she created in
her stories is not enough for her today – and has its own dullness of
repetition, as conveyed by the bleakness of the “unsustaining vastness” – a desert – “drear“ meaning desolate, empty, and the repeated “legion after legion” – undistinguished masses. Conjuring up these visions, to her surprise (“strangely”), causes her to feel the same
way about the world of the imagination as it does the world of “wealth and learning” – which, until
today, she has been happy to view as less real (“unreal”) than her imaginary one.
Today, as the commentator says, she is going “back to nature” by going
out for a walk – leaving all “worlds” behind.
Her determination is evident form the abrupt “I’ll walk”.
I'll walk, but not in old heroic traces,
And not in paths of high morality,
And not among the half-distinguished faces,
The clouded forms of long-past history.
And not in paths of high morality,
And not among the half-distinguished faces,
The clouded forms of long-past history.
The path she is going to take will
not be one taken in her imaginary worlds, populated with knights and ladies,
kings and queens who live lives of noble endeavour. She is going back to her “roots.”
I'll walk where my own nature would be leading:
It vexes me to choose another guide:
Where the grey flocks in ferny glens are feeding;
Where the wild wind blows on the mountain side.
It vexes me to choose another guide:
Where the grey flocks in ferny glens are feeding;
Where the wild wind blows on the mountain side.
The poet evokes the countryside that
has sustained her all her life; she has no need for a guide to understand
it. The alliteration emphasises her
passion for the simple, natural world and her feeling that she is at one with
the sheep on the hills and the wind blowing across it.
What have those lonely mountains worth revealing?
More glory and more grief than I can tell:
The earth that wakes one human heart to feeling
Can centre both the worlds of Heaven and Hell.
More glory and more grief than I can tell:
The earth that wakes one human heart to feeling
Can centre both the worlds of Heaven and Hell.
The rhetorical question anticipates
the cynicism of the “real world” of “wealth
and learning” about the value of nature to teach. Her robust response (in the emphatic repetition
of “more”) is that it can teach us everything
about triumph and failure – “glory and …grief”. If your heart is receptive, the power of
nature can make sense of the whole world and everything within it.
No comments:
Post a Comment