Themes
Fact
vs. Fancy
Dickens depicts
a terrifying system of education where facts, facts, and nothing but facts are
pounded into the schoolchildren all day, and where memorisation of information
is valued over art, imagination, or anything creative. This results in some
very warped human beings. Mr. Thomas Gradgrind believes completely in this
system, and as a superintendent of schools and a father, he makes sure that all
the children at the schools he is responsible for, and especially his own
children, are brought up knowing nothing but data and "-ologies".
As a result,
things go very badly for his children, Tom Gradgrind and Louisa Gradgrind.
Since they, as children, were always treated as if they had minds and not
hearts, their adulthoods are warped, as they have no way to access their
feelings or connect with others. Tom is a sulky good-for-nothing and gets
involved in a crime in an effort to pay off gambling debts. Louisa is unhappy
when she follows her mind, not her heart, and marries Mr. Bounderby, her
father's friend. As a result of her unhappy marriage, she is later swept off
her feet by a young gentleman, Mr. James "Jem" Harthouse, who comes
to stay with them and who seems to understand and love her. Louisa nearly comes
to ruin by running off with Harthouse.
Cecilia (Sissy)
Jupe was encouraged when she was little to dream and imagine. She loved her
father dearly, and therefore she is in touch with her heart and feelings, and
has empathy and emotional strength the other children lack. Sissy, adopted by
the Gradgrinds when her father abandons her, ultimately is the saviour of the
family in the end.
Industrialism
and Its Evils
Hand
in hand with the glorification of data and numbers and facts in the schoolhouse
is the treatment of the workers in the factories of Coketown as nothing more
than machines, which produce so much per day and are not thought of as having
feelings or families or dreams. Dickens depicts this situation as a result of
the industrialisation of England; now that towns like Coketown are focused on
producing more and more, more dirty factories are built, more smoke pollutes
the air and water, and the factory owners only see their workers as part of the
machines that bring them profit. In fact, the workers are only called
"Hands", an indication of how objectified they are by the owners.
Similarly, Mr. Gradgrind's children were brought up to be "minds".
None of them are people or "hearts".
As
the book progresses, it portrays how industrialism creates conditions in which
owners treat workers as machines and workers respond by unionising to resist
and fight back against the owners. In the meantime, those in Parliament (like
Mr. Gradgrind, who winds up elected to office) work for the benefit of the
country but not its people. In short, industrialisation creates an environment
in which people cease to treat either others or themselves as people. Even the
unions, the groups of factory workers who fight against the injustices of the
factory owners, are not shown in a good light.
Stephen Blackpool, a poor worker
at Bounderby's factory, is rejected by his fellow workers for his refusal to
join the union because of a promise made to the sweet, good woman he loves,
Rachael. His factory union then treats him as an outcast.
The
remedy to industrialism and its evils in the novel is found in Sissy Jupe, the
little girl who was brought up among circus performers and fairy tales. Letting
loose the imagination of children lets loose their hearts as well, and, as
Sissy does, they can combat and undo what a Gradgrind education produces.
Unhappy
Marriages
There
are many unhappy marriages in 'Hard Times' and none of them are resolved happily
by the end. Mr. Gradgrind's marriage to his feeble, complaining wife is not
exactly a source of misery for either of them, but neither are they or their
children happy. The Gradgrind family is not a loving or affectionate one. The
main unhappy marriage showcased by the novel is between Louisa Gradgrind and
Mr. Bounderby. Louisa marries him not out of love but out of a sense of duty to
her brother, Tom, the only person in the world she loves and who wheedles her
into saying "yes" because he works for Bounderby and wants to improve
his chances at rising in the world. Bounderby's intentions regarding Louisa
seem a bit creepy at first, but he turns out to mean no harm to her (except
that he deprives her of any marital affection). The only solution to this bad
marriage, once Louisa has escaped the hands of Jem Harthouse, is for Louisa to
live at home the rest of her days. She will never be happy with another man or
have the joy of children, though Dickens hints she will find joy in playing
with Sissy's future children.
Stephen
Blackpool, too, is damned to unhappiness in this life as a result of his
marriage. The girl who seemed so sweet when he married her many years ago
becomes, by a gradual process, a depraved drunk who is the misery of his life.
She periodically returns to Coketown to haunt Stephen and is, as he sees it,
the sole barrier to the happiness he might have had in marrying Rachael. Mrs.
Sparsit (an elderly lady who lives with Mr. Bounderby for some time) was also
unhappily married, which is how she came to be Mr. Bounderby's companion before
he marries Louisa.
Femininity
The
best, most good characters of Hard Times are women. Stephen Blackpool is a good
man, but his love, Rachael, is an "Angel". Sissy Jupe can overcome
even the worst intentions of Jem Harthouse with her firm and powerfully pure
gaze. Louisa, as disadvantaged as she is by her terrible upbringing, manages to
get out of her crisis at the last minute by fleeing home to her father for
shelter, in contrast to her brother, Tom, who chooses to commit a life-changing
crime in his moment of crisis. Through these examples, the novel suggests that
the kindness and compassion of the female heart can improve what an education
of "facts" and the industrialisation has done to children and to the
working middle class.
Still,
not all the women in the novel are paragons of goodness. Far from it. Mrs.
Sparsit is a comic example of femininity gone wrong. She cannot stand being
replaced by Louisa when Bounderby marries, and watches the progression of the
affair between Louisa and Jem Harthouse with glee. As she attempts to catch
them in the act of eloping (and ultimately fails), she is a cruel, ridiculous
figure. Stephen Blackpool's wife, meanwhile, is bleakly portrayed as a hideous
drunken prostitute.
So
while the novel holds women up as potentially able to overcome the dehumanising
effects of industrialisation and fact-based education, those women in the novel
who do not fill this role, who have slipped from the purity embodied by Sissy
and Rachael beyond even the empty-heartedness of Louisa, are presented as both
pathetically comic and almost demonic. Women in the novel seem like a potential
cure to the perils of industrialisation, but also the most at peril from its
corruption.